A Scientific Validity Report (SVR) is a part of the Performance Evaluation Report (PER) under the European Union In Vitro Diagnostic Devices Regulations (EU IVDR) 2017/746 that documents the scientific validation of the IVDs. The SVR supports the device's conformity assessment and for the same one must consider any relevant published literature and standards. It is usually accompanied by a summary of the results of the assessment.

Although the context of SVR described in the EU IVDR Regulatory compliance may appear brief, there are still numerous difficulties in drawing the document. The Scientific Validity Report must contain data demonstrating the device's diagnostic accuracy and effectiveness.

To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data, the following are a few key pointers that will help you improve the Scientific Validity Report:

Outlining the Plan

It is essential to document all of the steps taken in establishing the scientific validity of an IVD, irrespective of its type, application, and risk. This includes documenting the methodology used, the results obtained, and any additional information that may be relevant. Additionally, it is also important to provide a detailed description of the data appraisal and analysis and the conclusions that were drawn from the analysis.

Understanding and Interpretation of EU IVDR 2017/746

When drafting the SVR, it is essential to adhere to the guidelines and regulations established by the EU IVDR. This includes understanding the requirements for the scientific validity of the device, namely, its relationship with the clinical context as claimed in its intended purpose, while considering the generally acknowledged state-of-the-art. Additionally, the report should include a comprehensive assessment of the clinical performance of the product. For novel devices, the requirements of clinical studies, as well as proof-of-concept studies, are essential. All data should be verified and validated to ensure the report's accuracy. The major contributors to scientific validity are clinical practice guidelines or articles published by professional organizations. Finally, all necessary safety measures should be taken and included in the report.

Scientific Literature Review

To ensure that all evidence used in the SVR under EU IVDR compliance is gathered from the up-to-date scientific literature, a systematic literature review is essential. To do this, a thorough systematic search of recent publications in the clinical field and ensuring that all sources used are from reliable and respected journals is a must. Additionally, researchers should double-check that all data used is from the most recent sources available and has been peer-reviewed. The researchers should possess the skills of defining and appraising the literature sources and efficiently concluding the same.

Resource UtiliZation

To ensure accuracy in the SVR, the most critical aspect is resource utilization. The entire quality of the report depends upon the scientific expert. The experts should ensure that the report meets the criteria for evidence-based medicine, including the use of reliable sources, peer-reviewed literature, and other research-based sources. In addition, it is vital to have qualified experts review the report to ensure that the language is clear, concise, and technically accurate. It is often always a definite choice to utilize outsourced experts as typically they have expertise in various areas, and it saves time, money, and resources for the organization.

In conclusion, SVR is an essential part of the performance evaluation report under the EU IVDR 2017/746 and must contain data that demonstrate the scientific validity of a device for the indication. To ensure accuracy, the report should adhere to the guidelines and regulations established by the EU IVDR and must include a comprehensive assessment of the device's clinical performance, a risk assessment, and all necessary safety measures. Additionally, the SVR should be verified and validated and should incorporate up-to-date scientific literature that has been peer-reviewed. Finally, the quality of the report depends on the resource utilization of qualified scientific experts.

With more than a decade of experience in medical writing services, Freyr has been able to decipher more than 70 product categories. For any queries about Regulatory compliance, contact us today!